Is there a difference in meaning between "il devait faire qqc" and "il aurait dû faire qqc"?
l'imparfait vs conditionel passé
- « Back to Q&A Forum
- « Previous questionNext question »
Sebastian S.Kwiziq community member
l'imparfait vs conditionel passé
This question relates to:French lesson "Using "devoir" in the imperfect tense versus the compound past in French (L'Imparfait vs Le Passé Composé)"
Asked 4 months ago
Just to add to Maarten's answer:
Here is the difference between the two sentence:
Il devait faire qqc. -- He was supposed to do something.
Il aurait dû faire qqc. -- He should have done something.
Maarten K. Kwiziq Q&A super contributor
Sebastian,
a link to recent response from Céline.
Imparfait expresses the sense of a reproach that you were supposed to have done something, but not necessarily with any sense that something negative resulted because you didn’t.
The conditional passé conveys a stronger negative sense - because you didn’t do what you should have, look at what happened !
Don't have an account yet? Join today
Ask a question
Find your French level for FREE
Test your French to the CEFR standard
Find your French level