French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
15,080 questions • 32,803 answers • 1,049,480 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
15,080 questions • 32,803 answers • 1,049,480 learners
Would it be correct to use the three-layer structure I wrote down below, when building sentences with double pronouns? Imagine it like a matrix with three columns:
ME, TE, SE, NOUS, VOUS | LE, LA, LES | LUI, LEUR
Ex Nous vous | les envoyons demain. | e_m_p_t_y
Ex e_m_p_t_y | Je la | leur explique clairement.
Ex Je vous | la donne. | e_m_p_t_y
Ex e_m_p_t_y | Je la | lui donne.
Where to use vieux and vielle and naveau and nouvelle
I answered like this, il le lui a refusé? Il le nous a refusé aussi, I was wrong. What went wrong, please?
In a search to demystify the difference between savoir and connaître, I stumbled upon an article earlier that suggested something along the lines of "use connaître when you've had prior experience with something" with one of the examples being "vous connaissez [name of place]?" meaning have you been to [name of place]? instead of asking whether the person is aware of the existence of said place. The second example was "Je connais Brad Pitt"; a statement that implies that one has met Brad Pitt before rather than plainly saying that they know of the existence of him. Since this lesson hasn't mentioned anything regarding what I've said above, can anyone enlighten me on this matter?
Dans la deuxième phrase, nous devons traduire le mot, infuriating. Vous avez choisi "exaspérant" et je crois que vous avez aussi donné la possibilité "énervant". J'ai choisi "rageant" qui n'était pas acceptable. C'est un mauvais choix ? Pour moi, je pense que rager implique plus d'émotion que exaspérer ce qui est exactement le cas entre infuriate et exasperate en l'anglais. Vous n'est pas d'accord ?
Hi I don't understand why "Tous les enfants partent mais aucun ne prend le train" is correct but
:Tous les enfants partent mais aucun d’entre eux ne prend le train" is not.
THE LESSON SAYS: We can also express none of them using aucun d'entre eux ne ... / aucune d'entre elles ne ..., I understand "aucun d’entre eux/elles" is used with people and les enfants are people. Thanks.
Not really related to the lesson at hand, but in the example, isn’t besoin supposed to be followed by de?
Les chaussures dont tu as besoin sont dans le placard
And this one answer was Le même ???
But when is it Avoir vs Etre? I cant seem to learn the rule for this
Find your French level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your French level