French language Q&A Forum

Should we are going to Portugal be nous allons au Portugal or nous allons dans le Portugal.

I found these lessons on Youtube and hope they will be helpful in the interim   Here are the links(unsure they will work):   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-n8uQAYY8k

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJFSeMjRucA   

I have never seen "merci pour". From my knowledge, merci or remerci is followed by "de". Please provide further explanation on this topic or Is there a lesson on this within Kwizqi? 

En place de: Il ne faut pas que nous mangions avec nos doigts, puisqu'on dire: I faut que nous ne mangions pas avec nos doigts?

 In this example, "Il a acheté deux burritos, mais il n'a mangé ni l'un ni l'autre", would it be equally correct to add "en": "Il a acheté deux burritos, mais il n'en a mangé ni l'un ni l'autre"? And why isn't it necessary anyway?

The sentence refers to buying a "region".  To me, that implies a rather large estate with a fancy house and well-kept grounds.  My dictionary gives 'terres' as the preferred choice over 'domaine' when referring to lands.  Should this option not be added?  If not, why is domaine preferred?

In “et je ne connais pas bien la ville.” it sounds like “bien a ville”. There is no hint of an “l” sound. At least to my ears. This might also be what Jean meant. 

j'ai faim pour la nourrive de mexicain ( i am hungry for mexican food).

did this make sense?

Why are both of these correct:

"Je n'ai vu Mathieu nulle part." [ne + nulle part]

"Il n'est jamais allé nulle part." [ne + jamais + nulle part]

But not this:

"Je n'ai pas vu Mathieu nulle part." [ne + pas + nulle part]

is the near future in the imperfect the same as the subjective?  To translate something such as I "was/were going to" seems subjective to me.