French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,222 questions • 30,837 answers • 906,866 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,222 questions • 30,837 answers • 906,866 learners
Pourquoi on ne peut pas écrire?
1)Après être séparé au lieu de après s’être séparé. Dans la premiere option est-ce qu'il faut un objet....après être séparé de .... qqchose
2)six mois avant au lieu de six mois plus tôt?
3)That was the last time we played matchmakers
j'ai ecrit
c’était la dernière fois qu'on a joué les matchmakers.(c'est acceptable??)
Merci .
Re:
Le temps des deux parties m'a confuse dans cette phrase.
Il y a un exemple ou on utiliserait le subjonctif passe comme ca:
It does rather put modern man in a bad light, but that aside a good dictation exercise.
My main point though is that the woman's diction was clear but the man's was muffled and difficult to understand.
depuis que j'etais petite pendant l'hiver, on a campe dans les montagnes dans le canton de Geneve.
I sometimes see references to "des" as being a plural partitive article.
This relates to uncountable/mass nouns. So my query is:-
How is it possible to have a plural uncountable noun?
and then to try to express "some" of this uncountable/mass noun?
It seems that requérir can double as meaning both "require" and "request",
despite the fact that the translations you gave for it were:
requérir (to require/call for [something])and did not mention 'request':
(Nous requérons votre présence à cet événement.
We're requesting your presence at this event.)Why is it "Tarte au Maroilles" and not "Tarte aux Maroilles"?
Is opposé used rather than en face de ever? In what circumstance would I use opposé(e)? Would I be understood if I used opposé and not en face de? Merci.
Find your French level for FREE
Test your French to the CEFR standard
Find your French level