French language Q&A Forum

This was a very interesting lesson to me that appeared in my dashboard but I have always believed that in daily life the subjonctif passé would not be used. Is this a question of educational level or are there simpler ways to express the same sentiments?

Can I suggest that in this part of the lesson:

Use tout ce qui when the pronoun qui is followed by a verb or an object/reflexive pronoun (as opposed to a subject pronoun -je/tu/il/elle/on/nous/vous/ils/elles - or a noun):  You replace the list of subject pronouns with a list of object pronouns. You repeat the list of subject pronouns under 'que'.

What is the English translation for “histoire d’en profiter au maximum tant que ça dure.”

Merci

I would like to know why the last phrase is in the present "c'est avec des larmes" when the rest of the text is in the past. I have seen the present used for obituaries, but on those occasions the present is used throughout the text, not just on one occasion. Est-ce qu'il y a quelqu'un qui peut m'expliquer?

Hello Kwiziq Community,

Would you know the nuances between using devra and devrait in this sentence ? Thank you.

Maybe it's just on my end but the "avoir" example has "eu" and "pris" examples under it. 

Bonjour Kwiziq, je m'appelle Spencer et je viens d'Atlanta au Amérique.

I did miserably on this exercise. Seems that in progressing from B1 to B2 one faces quite a chasm. Without a bridge.

The given answer is: Le temps que tu sois prête, le bus était déjà parti.

But both clauses of his sentence seem to be in the past, so is it okay (even better) to write:
Le temps que tu aies été prête, le bus était déjà parti. ?

qui+est  = qu'est ??