Invalid Question.
French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
15,037 questions • 32,602 answers • 1,028,030 learners
I'll be right with you...
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
15,037 questions • 32,602 answers • 1,028,030 learners
The lesson gives two examples: Tu te les brosses and Je me les brosse. Why are they not both brosses?
I think there were two words that could have been used, including brouille. When I looked up rift in Wordreference, it gave me rupture in this context. Is that not a possibility ?
The above is the translation given for "a pair of black trainers" to describe what a wanted criminal was wearing, but alternatives given include "une paire de baskets noire", which seems unnatural as it’s the shoes that are black, not the pair. Is it a typo or a real alternative in French? I may be overthinking this, but in English "pair" would generally be omitted (as in some of the alternative correct answers). It’d be odd if he weren’t wearing two of them..
This was a very enjoyable (and challenging) dictée (but then I do have a fetish for the subjunctive for some reason!)
A vocabulary question, however. I can't quite see what function the word "confondus" is playing in the sentence "Chaque fois qu'il franchissait le seuil d'une classe, élèves et professeurs confondus se taisaient à l'unisson." Clearly the sense of this is something like "Whenever he crossed the threshold of a classroom, pupils and teachers alike fell silent together", but how does "confondu" function in this? I suppose I'm asking how it literally translates, so I can make sense of its idiomatic use...
In the lessons on endings it says that amongst the exceptions endings …eur are feminine but the answer was marked as masculine. This answer does not follow the lessons rules. Please could you explain
Why "il y a eu une brouille" rather than il y avait une brouille" My understanding is "a eu" means something like "got." A single action in the past while "avait" implies an ongoing action. Sounds to me that the rift was more like an ongoing action than a single incident.
The following is the first answer stated for using pour or de to give thanks for something tangible.
"To express thank you for + [noun], you can use EITHER merci de or merci pour + [nom], although:"
Then, almost as an after thought it states specifics on when to ACTUALLY use pour or de to give thanks for abstract, THEN physical or tangible nouns.
No wonder I got this wrong. PLEASE CLARIFY THIS IN A STRAIGHTFORWORD WAY, so other don't make the same I made over and over before reading the fine print. Thank you. I didn't write it in French so I wouldn't mess up again. :o)
I am unsure why "Antoine a mal aux épaules" is correct since "épaules" is femine and should use the article la unless "é" negates the use of " l' ". Thank you.
Bruce
Considering the followoing rule "In French, you use pendant/durant + [durée], or simply the duration itself, to express a duration with a clear beginning and end." Does the question below bot have both the options correct ?
the J'ai attendu ________ devant la gare (I waited for forty minutes in front of the station).
Pendant quarante minutes / quarante minutes
Thanks for reply.
kind regards,
Rahul
Reviewing this lesson, I have a question about the explanation of the two different conjugations. The lesson states:
"First conjugation:
(Note that for the 'tu' form, two pronunciations are possible)."
This is confusing as I am aware of only one pronunciation for "Assieds-toi". (And, only one pronunciation is used in the audio.)
If the lesson is referring to the difference in pronunciation between the first conjugation and the second conjugation, then not only the "tu" form, but also the "nous" and "vous" forms differ from their respective pronunciations.
A clarification would be helpful.
Merci mes amis,
N. Hilary
Find your French level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your French level