French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,880 questions • 32,336 answers • 1,007,137 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,880 questions • 32,336 answers • 1,007,137 learners
brrrrrrrrrrrrrr
I don't understand the construction of " j'avais des démangeaisons ". What is the role of "des"? It looks like a preposition between an auxiliary verb and a main verb. Or is "démangeaisons " a noun? It certainly looks like a verb. Thanks for any help.
Are both of them correct and both can be used equally?
- Je me suis arrêtée d’aller à la salle de sport.
- J'ai arrêté d'aller à la salle de sport.
[I stopped going to the gym.]
Why we have "Je donne de l'argent" and not "Je donne l'argent"
Why does the last sentence use the impersonal construction, "Pourquoi se priver" instead of "nous priver"?
Also, I translated "namely" as "en l'occurrence" but that wasn't one of the accepted answers (only "nommément" and "à savoir"). Is there a difference?
I would like to know the best way to study with kwiziq to get the most out of it. Can anyone share your ideas?
Why is it "des" here, when there is (presumably) only one Martine?
Can't find a unifying rule for both these. Shouldn't it. Either:
Jolie sac & bleu robe
Or:
Sac Jolie & robe bleue
Merci
Find your French level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your French level