French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,915 questions • 32,388 answers • 1,011,794 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,915 questions • 32,388 answers • 1,011,794 learners
Whew! I listened to this section a dozen times and was not anywhere close to that answer!
Maybe consider adding ¨hollywoodien¨ or something similar to the pre-lesson hints...?
Why is suivie made feminine in the sentence, "Ils ont passé leur samedi à flâner dans les rues de la ville, avant de rejoindre l'hôtel pour une petite séance de sauna, suivie d'un somptueux repas gastronomique" ? If it is an adjective I cannot determine what noun it is modifying.
Isn't "après-midi" masculine, and if so should it not be:
cet après-midi sera consacré
How do know when to use these before the season?
During the exercise, per the bot, "tomates-cerises" is correct. However, the finished text has "tomates cerises" with no hyphen. Which is correct?
I don't understand this sentence at all. Perhaps de rever, but first person singular? The rest of the exercise is in the past, it has already happened.
Here it is
‚c‘est M.Dupont qui était responsable…‘
Is this an expression that always uses the present tense followed by the imperfect? Could you use imperfect and imperfect in this example ……c‘était M. Dupont qui était…..
Thank you
Why does the last sentence use the impersonal construction, "Pourquoi se priver" instead of "nous priver"?
Also, I translated "namely" as "en l'occurrence" but that wasn't one of the accepted answers (only "nommément" and "à savoir"). Is there a difference?
I translated this exercise perfectly but scored zero. That was I misunderstood and found the exercise difficult to interpret.
Find your French level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your French level