French language Q&A Forum

elle a plus mangé que moi   or  elle a mangé plus que moi
Blandine a  joué  plus au tennis que toi. (is it valid?)

Blandine a  joué   au tennis  plus que toi. (is it valid?)

Blandine a plus  joué   au tennis  que toi. (is it valid?)

which ones of them are valid? 

Bonjour à tous, 

I've come access this sentence somewhere using "être on train de" in Conditionnel passé tense:

I would have been skying in the Alps if I hadn’t broken my leg.

Je serais en train de skier dans les Alpes si je ne m’étais pas cassé la

jambe.

I think we must use avoir (in Conditionnel présent) + être (in past participle) as follow:

J'aurais été en train de skier....

Could you explain which one is correct?

Merci beaucoup d'avance.

Hi,

I have read the below but it's still not clear to me. What is the difference between:

J'ai descendu les escaliers...

Je suis descendu du train...

Hi, just a little correction, soixante-dix should be at the top of the list :)

What would be the easiest way to remember how to use the inversion with the verb first and the Qu'est ce que etc?

Thank you in advance

It would be helpful to get an English translation at the end of the exercise   For example, I’m not very clear what dans son assiette means. 

I understand how they are formed but I don't understand when they should be used and when they shouldn't be used. I don't understand how to determine whether the verb should be reflexive or not and in what type of sentences you should use it, could you please clarify this for me. Thanks in advance.

I am not sure when to use:  Leur/s, or les, for instance...is it leur with people and les with things?

Hello .

I was asking why is it .that some words are join when u speak them and other are divided when u speakin..why