Invalid Question.
French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,534 questions • 31,454 answers • 942,677 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,534 questions • 31,454 answers • 942,677 learners
#1 is your answer, which does not have the apostrophe between "qui and il". You said this was correct. My answer #2 has the appropriate contraction "qu'il est", but you marked it wrong. Why?
La #1 La femme avec qui il est marié est très belle. #2La femme avec qu'il est marié est très belle.are here, but the one that counts is not. This is upsetting.
I think it was well written, and I am not good at typing! So, don't want to do it again.
I did a lot of typing to explain the quite obvious error in the answer. What happened to it?
"Elle prendra l'avion à New York, puis fera une escale à Paris avant de prendre un autre vol pour Montpellier."
Why is it "prendra l'avion à New York" but "pour" for "prendre un autre vol pour Montpellier"? Is there a reason it can't be "à Montpellier"?
How can I used il' y a in a sentence , I know il' y a is there is . So can I used like "il 'y a un chat en ma maison" that is correct ?
If I write nous allons but in past sentence , I can write like Nous avons allons au centre commerciale. That is correct?
In "le causatif", consider the sentences :
Eva s'est fait laver les cheveux par sa soeur ;
Ils se sont fait piquer par des guêpes.
I know fait is invariable here, but I don't understand why it is, and not faite or faits (or faites)
Thanks
/DO
So if I write "Nous allons a le centre commerciale" We are going to the mall. That sentence is correct?
Why is the conditional called 'present' when the stem is the same as the future tense
Find your French level for FREE
Test your French to the CEFR standard
Find your French level